paranoia agent
JoinedPosts by paranoia agent
-
paranoia agent
Let her make the choice. -
102
A couple questions for atheists on Suffering
by little_Socrates inwho told you that the world should be free from suffering?.
do you find any value in suffering?.
do you think it is possible to experience all the beauty and goodness and pleasure the world offers without also experiencing the bad?
-
paranoia agent
Who told you that the world should be free from suffering?
Do you find any value in suffering?
Do you think it is possible to experience all the beauty and goodness and pleasure the world offers without also experiencing the bad? Isn't good only good because we know what bad is? If there was only good would it really be "good"?
If you where God and could eliminate suffering what would the world look like? Or conversely if there was a loving God what should we expect the world to look like?
If you think about it, a world without world suffering would be nonsensical. Let me put it this way, you can't know light if there never was darkness. In the same manner you couldn't know suffering without happiness.
Now in the real world we do things with little regard to suffering. We hunt and eat animals. We defend our countries, etc. Cognitively we have tools that deludes us from reality, inflating our ego (evolutionary psychology has a lot to say on this). It's just that we make ad hoc and a priori excuses for them.
So I would like there to be a world of less suffering, and this is viably possible to some extent in our world from our time if I am to disregard those with brain deficiencies that cause depression, bipolar, schizophrenia and the such. I see a need for global harmony and anti-nationalism as did Einstein and Nietzsche.
Now if I was god that is a difficult question. Even if a god did exist it would be subjected to the laws of logic. After all god couldn't create a squared triangle, but happiness and suffering are harmonies to logic. So i hope that from this you understand that we are all chained to the laws of mathematics, of nature.
-
2
Book reviews by Steve Hassan
by paranoia agent ini have a small blog space which i do really short book reviews that i have read.. the latest entry are books by ex-cult councilor steven hassan.. http://psychbookreviews.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/combatting-cult-mind-control-ccmc.html.
-
paranoia agent
Thank you ABibleStudent
Probably not. I mean I don't mind if it shows up in the library or if someone is willing to donate it for a couple of months.
-
2
Book reviews by Steve Hassan
by paranoia agent ini have a small blog space which i do really short book reviews that i have read.. the latest entry are books by ex-cult councilor steven hassan.. http://psychbookreviews.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/combatting-cult-mind-control-ccmc.html.
-
paranoia agent
I have a small blog space which I do really short book reviews that I have read.
The latest entry are books by ex-cult councilor Steven Hassan.
http://psychbookreviews.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/combatting-cult-mind-control-ccmc.html
-
4
FEAR
by paranoia agent inwatch, wath it all.. .
http://youtu.be/o-vlhnpwju0.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-vlhnpwju0.
-
10
To understand cults we need to start understanding ourselves
by paranoia agent inthere are books out there that talk about why it is so difficult to convince someone that they are wrong.
hassan and singer specifically address destructive cults.
hassan refers to cult members under mind control and singer under thought reform.
-
paranoia agent
A metaphor Jonathan Haidt used in his book The Righteous Mind is that the mind is composed of two parts, the elephant (automatic processes - intuition) and the rider [of the elephant] (controlled processes - reasoning). The rider can do little to control or persuade the elephant, and can only think ahead of what the elephant will do. The key here to understand is that intuitionalism comes first before rationalism.
Recalling Hume, the rider is the servant and the elephant is the master. Elephants can be open to reason when discussions are not hostile, or they will lean away making the rider work frantically to rebut the opponent’s charges.
JW’s teach that we are hostile, it is no wonder that it’s difficult to convince let alone engage with a jw.
Thanks OneEyedJoe
-
10
To understand cults we need to start understanding ourselves
by paranoia agent inthere are books out there that talk about why it is so difficult to convince someone that they are wrong.
hassan and singer specifically address destructive cults.
hassan refers to cult members under mind control and singer under thought reform.
-
paranoia agent
There are books out there that talk about why it is so difficult to convince someone that they are wrong. Hassan and Singer specifically address destructive cults. Hassan refers to cult members under mind control and Singer under thought reform. They both imply the same thing; there are social psychological factors at play that shapes and controls a person’s reasoning without being perceived by the victim.
However, when reading these books I always wondered whether Hassam and Singer were being hypocritical. That is Hassan divided two ideologies, one that uses coercive persuasion and the other that respects the individuals views. Singer did the same in her book Cults In Our Midst. Check the link - http://factnet.org/mind-controlbrainwashingthought-reform-exists - scroll all the way down for a good explanation on the differences between cults and religions.
I agree that there are differences, however I have associated for a while now with other theists and there appears to be similarities. For example there are sociocentric and individualist cultures. Sociocentric places needs to groups and institutions and lesser to the needs of individuals, while individualist cultures places needs on individuals. Cults and political parties like the national socialists, Marxism, and certain countries that practice Islam are all sociocentric, and so are other religions that think as groups whether its protestant, orthodox and catholic. Taking this into account we can make an important point on how the Jehovah’s witnesses base their morals, they are totalitarian, they are sociocentric, they are all for the borg and nothing for the individual. Some religions are more extreme than others. But unlike Hassan\Singer, can we make a distinction between certain sociocentric ideologies?
Ever since these books have been published a number of peer review articles have been made to expand on this issue on how to convince others that they are wrong. It started with the story abouts the wolf that change its mind. Freud taught the conflicts between the ID\ego\super ego. Festinger expanded with Freud with his scientific theory of cognitive dissonance. Gilovich found how commonly we resort to confirmation bias. Ariely did some socio economic scientific studies on people and found that we are not rational. Tetlock concluded the we persuade ourselves, and there are more, but the point being is that we are irrational.
There is a cult component yes, but there is also a YOU component that we need to understand. Atheists are not free from this, it doesn’t discriminate, it’s a human thing. It’s sociobiological and environmental. The core problem comes from our reasoning.
David Hume was the first to find this flaw - reason is and ought only to be the slave of the passion, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.
-
142
How do JWs Not see how barbaric YHWH is? Its what started my awakening.
by BU2B inif one reads genesis from the first chapter through the end with an open mind, it is clear that not only is it not true, but that god is potrayed as a cruel, petty, childish micromanaging tyrant.
if one continues reading the ot this is just further solidified.
how do jws not see the obvious?
-
paranoia agent
Cofty: yes she did, all christians do.
Have a great day.
-
142
How do JWs Not see how barbaric YHWH is? Its what started my awakening.
by BU2B inif one reads genesis from the first chapter through the end with an open mind, it is clear that not only is it not true, but that god is potrayed as a cruel, petty, childish micromanaging tyrant.
if one continues reading the ot this is just further solidified.
how do jws not see the obvious?
-
paranoia agent
cofty: It's implied.
-
23
Hello from Still Totally ADD glad to be back
by Still Totally ADD init's been 6 months now since my old computer died.
a good friend of our's had a spare computer her husband never used so she asked me if i would like to have it.
after cleaning it up inside and out i found out i could not remember my password and the e-mail i gave them i no longer use.
-
paranoia agent
Hi still totally ADD, I am also ADD but found out recently, would you be aware of any medication that I can use for long periods of study?